Accessibility as Collective Process
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v26i1.4909Résumé
This editorial provides different perspectives on access and invites readers, authors and reviewers to actively join the collective process of improving accessibility.
Références
Chandler, E., Johnson, M. A., Jones, C., Harrison, E., & Rice, C. (2023). Enacting reciprocity and solidarity: Critical access as methodology.Australian Feminist Studies,38(115–116), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2024.2333055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2024.2333055
Hamraie, A. (2017). Building access: Universal design and the politics of disability.University of Minnesota Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9781517901639.001.0001
Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K. (2019). Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst, 5(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607
Kenny, C., & Stige, B. (2001). Voices: World Forum for Music Therapy—A new avenue for communication among music therapy communities.Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy,1(1). https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v1i1.35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v1i1.35
Papalia. C. (January 2, 2018). An accessibility manifesto for the arts. https://canadianart.ca/essays/access-revived/
Titchkosky, T. (2011). The question of access: Disability, space, meaning(1st ed). University of Toronto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v1i1.27
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Maren Metell 2026
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Articles published prior to 2019 are subject to the following license, see: https://voices.no/index.php/voices/copyright
