Accessibility as Collective Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v26i1.4909Abstract
This editorial provides different perspectives on access and invites readers, authors and reviewers to actively join the collective process of improving accessibility.
References
Chandler, E., Johnson, M. A., Jones, C., Harrison, E., & Rice, C. (2023). Enacting reciprocity and solidarity: Critical access as methodology.Australian Feminist Studies,38(115–116), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2024.2333055
Hamraie, A. (2017). Building access: Universal design and the politics of disability.University of Minnesota Press.
Hamraie, A., & Fritsch, K. (2019). Crip technoscience manifesto. Catalyst, 5(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607
Kenny, C., & Stige, B. (2001). Voices: World Forum for Music Therapy—A new avenue for communication among music therapy communities.Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy,1(1). https://doi.org/10.15845/voices.v1i1.35
Papalia. C. (January 2, 2018). An accessibility manifesto for the arts. https://canadianart.ca/essays/access-revived/
Titchkosky, T. (2011). The question of access: Disability, space, meaning(1st ed). University of Toronto Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maren Metell

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published prior to 2019 are subject to the following license, see: https://voices.no/index.php/voices/copyright