<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<!--<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="article.xsl"?>-->
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en"
   xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
   <front>
      <journal-meta>
         <journal-id journal-id-type="DOAJ">15041611</journal-id>
         <journal-title-group>
            <journal-title>Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy</journal-title>
         </journal-title-group>
         <issn>1504-1611</issn>
         <publisher>
            <publisher-name>Grieg Academy Music Therapy Research Centre, Uni Research
               Health</publisher-name>
         </publisher>
      </journal-meta>
      <article-meta>
         <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://dx.doi.org/10.15845/voices.v17i2.944</article-id>
         <article-categories>
            <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
               <subject>Editorial</subject>
            </subj-group>
         </article-categories>
         <title-group>
            <article-title>An Inclusive Stance With a Critical Edge</article-title>
         </title-group>
         <contrib-group>
            <contrib contrib-type="author">
               <name>
                  <surname>McFerran</surname>
                  <given-names>Katrina</given-names>
               </name>
               <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
               <address>
                  <email>k.mcferran@unimelb.edu.au</email>
               </address>
            </contrib>
         </contrib-group>
         <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label>University of Melbourne</aff>
         <pub-date pub-type="pub">
            <day>1</day>
            <month>7</month>
            <year>2017</year>
         </pub-date>
         <volume>17</volume>
         <issue>2</issue>
         <permissions>
            <copyright-statement>Copyright: 2017 The Author(s)</copyright-statement>
            <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
         </permissions>
      </article-meta>
   </front>
   <body>
      <sec>
         <p>VOICES is a journal that <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"
               xlink:href="https://voices.no/index.php/voices/about/editorialPolicies#focusAndScope"
               >“invites dialogue and discussion about music, health, and social change.”</ext-link>
            Many of the contributors to the journal are professional music therapists whose
            university training has been focused entirely on how the affordances of music can, and
            have, been used to promote a range of opportunities for people with diverse life
            experiences. Each university training program teaches different theoretical emphases, so
            whilst there is broad agreement about the international practice of music therapy, there
            are specific, local differences. Some of these are cultural and others are personal.
            Further, each music therapist then has the freedom to decide what their particular
            approach will be in the institution, community organization, or private practice setting
            where they work. This is usually in response to the perceived needs of the people who
            participate in music therapy but is naturally influenced by a range of factors.</p>
         <p>The editorial team at VOICES has chosen to position our journal so that it is open to
            contributions from around the world that represent the full range of positions. We
               <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"
               xlink:href="https://voices.no/index.php/voices/about/editorialPolicies#focusAndScope"
               >“value inclusiveness and socio-cultural awareness and have increasingly nurtured a
               critical edge that refines the focus on cultural issues and social
               justice.”</ext-link> We encourage authors to position themselves so that their own
            particular stance is made clear, but we celebrate the full spectrum of manuscripts that
            emerge from diverse practices. To that end, we have a range of <ext-link
               ext-link-type="uri"
               xlink:href="https://voices.no/index.php/voices/about/editorialPolicies#sectionPolicies"
               >sections</ext-link> of the journal, including Research, Case Stories, Interviews,
            Columns and Essays, Position Papers, Reports, as well as Book Reviews and Book
            Essays.</p>
         <p>We have increasingly tailored our <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"
               xlink:href="https://voices.no/index.php/voices/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess"
               >reviewing processes</ext-link> to match these values with high levels of dialogue
            and transparency. In this edition, we are including the names of reviewers as well as
            the names of our abstract translators from around the globe. This affords the reader
            potential understandings about how some of the diversity in articles results from the
            different cultural and theoretical positions of reviewers, as well as the authors. It
            also acknowledges the tremendously important voluntary contributions made by members of
            our <ext-link ext-link-type="uri"
               xlink:href="https://voices.no/index.php/voices/about/editorialTeam">editorial board
               and translation team.</ext-link>
         </p>
         <p>The result of maintaining an inclusive stance with a critical edge and a commitment to
            making knowledge available to people around the globe via open access demands ongoing
            reflexivity. To this end, the editorial team is constantly engaged in discussion and
            reflection on how to best represent the values of our journal in the manuscripts we
            publish, and this is actively incorporated into our reviewing process. Although all the
            articles in the current edition represent music therapists’ perspectives, they
            demonstrate a range of positions and varying degrees of emphasis on socio-cultural awareness. A number of
            articles in this edition focus on infants and young children. However the aspects of
            practice that are described with this age group ways are diverse, and the emphasis on
            research, practice, and theory vary considerably. Kirsi Maaria Tuomi, Ala-Ruona Esa, and
            Amelia Oldfield provide an overview of 22 years of literature on music therapy and early
            childhood and highlight an increasing emphasis on family involvement and positive
            factors. This is certainly illustrated in this edition, with a range of authors
            emphasizing the value of working with families using vignettes as well as qualitative
            and quantitative case studies. This is evidenced in Mark Ettenberger’s reflections on
            music therapy practice during end-of life care in the NICU in Colombia that highlights
            ritual, culture, and memory making with parents and infants. It is also emphasized by
            nearby colleagues in Brazil, but these authors choose a very different approach.
            Although focusing on the subjective notion of empowerment, Ambra Palazzi, Rita Meschini,
            and Cesar Augusto Piccinini have used quantitative methods to examine a music therapy
            intervention with a mother-preterm infant dyad, also in the NICU. Jess O' Donoghue also
            emphasises effectiveness but uses qualitative data generated through observations to
            examine parent-child interactions for families with children who have Down syndrome.
            Jessica June Nagel and Michael Joseph Silverman also use qualitative data to explore the
            development of parenting skills, but this time interviewing music therapists to gather
            their perspectives from work with families experiencing poverty in the USA. One further
            perspective is offered on music therapy in the context of families, this time exploring
            the affordances of music to support the recovery of a survivor of childhood abuse.
            Georgina Lewis uses auto-ethnographic analysis to reflect on how music serves different
            functions during four stages of recovery.</p>
         <p>This edition is not only focused on childhood experiences however, with two manuscripts
            that explicitly argue for the integration of different theoretical frameworks into music
            therapy practice. Rosemyriam Cunha focuses on the framework of musicking from the
            discipline of musicology, emphasizing collective music making with groups to promote
            positive change. Niels Hannibal and Melody Schwantes provide a rationale for the
            integration of mentalization into music therapy practice, based on extensive experience
            working with people who have borderline personality disorder.</p>
         <p>This edition of VOICES certainly addresses our desire for inclusivity and offers a range
            of theoretical perspectives and research approaches from around the globe. We hope this
            diversity affords you, the reader, an opportunity to engage with ideas that naturally
            resonate with your own stance. We also hope you may find something outside of that which
            you knew already. Studies of human nature suggest that it is much more difficult for us
            to tolerate and integrate ideas that do not match our own, but we aim to provide
            opportunities which you may take or leave. This is the great advantage of an open-access
            forum that does not require you to financially commit before reading, and therefore
            allows you to access knowledge from wherever you are, at any time, when and if you
            choose. Happy reading.</p>
      </sec>
   </body>
   <back> </back>
</article>
